The union representing thousands of largely part-time workers who provide care for vulnerable people in the NZ community is urging the Government to retain the current sick leave provisions.
On Wednesday, the Government launched a review of the Holidays Act and is considering pro-rating sick leave entitlements ‘to better reflect how much an employee works’.
"This is just unfair and will penalise thousands of women, many of whom work part-time caring for some of the most vulnerable people in our community," says Public Service Association Te Pūkenga Here Tikanga Mahi National Secretary Kerry Davies.
"It shouldn’t matter if you are part-time or full-time - sickness doesn’t discriminate."
Home support worker Eleanor Keepa works around 20 hours a week in Auckland. She opposes any change to sick leave, which was doubled to 10 days by the last government.
"My sick leave could just go up and down and I could end up going to work sick as I couldn’t afford not to work. They tell us not to go to work sick but when you are on a low income you can’t afford to take leave. Taking annual leave when you are sick would be unfair - we all need holidays."
The PSA says the Government is once again bowing to pressure from business and moving at pace to solve a problem that just doesn’t exist.
"A minimum of 10 days sick leave made good sense for businesses and employers - nobody should be forced to go to work sick, particularly in residential facilities and hospitality," says Kerry Davies.
"With Covid still amongst us, why rush a change like this?
"It appears the Government is intent on limited fast track consultation that currently excludes any mention of consultation with unions. That is not consultation.
"We will be advocating strongly to make sure workers who are sick can rest and get well and protect vulnerable clients."
1 comment
This is not discriminating...
Posted on 08-06-2024 22:05 | By groutby
...........for or against and particular person in any particular industry. It seems to me to be perfectly logical and 'fair' that such leave is apportioned to the hours that is worked.
While I understand the removal of some sick leave from what is considered to be 'part time' workers appears to be grossly unfair, employers being penalised financially potentially without getting the rewards from the employee is equally 'unfair'...
Valued employees can negotiate a better deal or indeed walk away, and surely it is more likely to open up more employment opportunities if employers are able to factor in less overheads.
No, I am not an employer, and yes I am a part time worker.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.