Council greenlights $128m Tauranga museum

Tauranga's civic precinct Te Manawataki o Te Papa. Artist's impression of the civic whare, museum and exhibition centre. Image / Tauranga City Council

Tauranga will finally get the museum it has “deserved for so long” after two decades of talking about it.

The civic whare, exhibition gallery and museum project – part of the $306 million civic precinct – was approved by Tauranga City Council on Monday.

The city centre precinct, named Te Manawataki o Te Papa, also includes a library and community hub which is under construction and due to be finished in 2026.

Te Manawataki o Te Papa was approved by the council’s government-appointed commission in 2022.

The newly elected council was asked whether to continue with the project and given three options on Monday: proceed with the civic whare, museum and exhibition centre; stop construction and remediate the site or pause the project and redesign it.

The decision to continue with the $128.4m civic whare, museum and exhibition centre passed in a 7-2 vote after about five hours of discussion.

Dozens of museum supporters filled the public gallery for Monday’s meeting.

The public gallery of Monday's Tauranga City Council meeting was full of museum supporters. Photo / David Hall
The public gallery of Monday's Tauranga City Council meeting was full of museum supporters. Photo / David Hall

Former councillor Mary Dillon told the meeting the heart of the Te Manawataki o Te Papa was the community whare, exhibition and museum, and if that was damaged the whole precinct would be compromised.

The project was the key to making Tauranga’s history highly visible and would lead people on the road to informed cultural understanding, said Dillon.

“Do it right, do it well, and do it for our future.”

Alan Withy spoke on behalf of the Elms Trust, Tauranga Historical Society and Taonga Tu Heritage Bay of Plenty, saying there were thousands of artefacts in council storage waiting for somewhere to be displayed.

Museums were more than a repository — they were a gateway and window to a city, its history and culture, said Withy.

Manawataki means heartbeat, and he questioned how there could be a heartbeat without culture and history.

“I urge you not to rip out the historic and cultural heart of Te Manawataki o Te Papa.”

Otamataha Trust chairman Puhirake Ihaka said the buildings needed to represent the relationship mana whenua had built with the council. Photo / David Hall
Otamataha Trust chairman Puhirake Ihaka said the buildings needed to represent the relationship mana whenua had built with the council. Photo / David Hall

Otamataha Trust chairman Puhirake Ihaka said the trust wholeheartedly supported the project.

The Otamataha Trust represents mana whenua from Ngāi Tamarāwaho and Ngāti Tapu hapū, whose traditional rohe [area] includes the precinct and city centre land.

The precinct land, between Hamilton and Wharf Streets, is jointly owned by the council and Otamataha Trust through the Te Manawataki o Te Papa Charitable Trust.

Ihaka said the precinct needed to have buildings that recognised the importance of the land and the relationship between mana whenua and the council.

Mayor Mahé Drysdale said it was another project the new council had inherited from the commission and was already under way.

Whether the newly elected council would have done the project, or done it to the same scale, was a moot point, he said.

Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the council could deliver the museum that had been talked about for 25 years. Photo / David Hall
Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the council could deliver the museum that had been talked about for 25 years. Photo / David Hall

The best decision as a council was to deliver the project as planned, Drysdale said.

It would help revitalise the CBD and was a significant attraction for people, he said.

Councillor Hautapu Baker said Te Manawataki o Te Papa meant the heartbeat of Te Papa.

The heart’s purpose was to pump blood and deliver oxygen to keep the body well.

“For a very long time Te Papa has been on some form of life support. I believe that the civic whare, museum and exhibition centre is the piece that’s needed to restore the essence.”

Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular said the project would enable creativity, exploration and education.

“It’s time for Tauranga to say yes to a museum, exhibition centre and civic whare. We need a place to tell our stories.”

Councillor Rick Curach and Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular. Photo / David Hall
Councillor Rick Curach and Deputy Mayor Jen Scoular. Photo / David Hall

Councillor Rick Curach said he needed to honour his campaign commitments that he would not support an investment in the civic precinct and would focus on affordability.

“We’ve got to start making some calls to save money.”

Councillor Glen Crowther said the operational costs were a bigger issue than the initial costs.

Projected at more than $30m per year, it would be one of the most expensive library and museums in the country, he said.

He said he would prefer a scaled-back museum to free up money for other projects.

Ratepayers will fund $151.5m of the precinct’s capital costs. The rest will come from external funders, including a $21m TECT grant, Government and local grants, and selling council assets.

The council reported there were financial disadvantages to stopping the project, including losing the TECT grant and having to repay a $12.1m grant from the previous government.

The council had also already spent an unrecoverable $20m on the earthworks and piling, and would also face costs for breaking contracts.

An artist's impression of the civic whare where public meetings will be held. Image / Tauranga City Council
An artist's impression of the civic whare where public meetings will be held. Image / Tauranga City Council

 

 

Drysdale said the council needed to be aware Te Manawataki o Te Papa was a large expense.

Plans and discussions about a museum in Tauranga had been happening for 25 years and now the council could deliver, he said.

Speaking after the meeting, Dillon said she been advocating for a museum since 1999 and was relieved Tauranga would have one.

“Tauranga will finally get the facility it’s deserved for so long. It will give us a real opportunity for talking about who we actually are and who we want to be.”

Otamataha Trust representative Buddy Mikaere told Local Democracy Reporting they were very pleased with the outcome.

“Having the project go ahead restores mana to that piece of land.”

The museum project is due to be completed at the end of 2028.

Prior councils abandoned plans for a $55.7m museum on Cliff Rd in 2018 and a waterfront museum proposal in 2007.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

16 comments

What is going into the museum

Posted on 10-12-2024 16:11 | By Andrew64

I have no doubt there will be plenty of hand-wringing, sob stories tales of woe and dismay from the various trusts and expert historians that appear at every opportunity condemning the evil colonists for their deeds against the ‘butter wouldn't melt in their mouths' ‘original' (read got here a few years before us) inhabitants. No thank you. I prefer the truth to what will no doubt be a woke showcase.


Referendum

Posted on 10-12-2024 16:58 | By rogue

You know for a democracy I often wonder how much of a say we get.
Clearly someone involved in Council wants a Museum that probably won't get used.
Meanwhile we have Council amenities in a dire state.
Memorial, Otumoetai and Greerton swimming pools are awful and way too small for the amount of use they get.
The Tauranga Domain where our Bay Steamers try their best every year should of be bowled in the 90's.
We have a sewerage system at capacity which will probably break & " catch everyone by surprise".
Yet the council once again plough on with plans for a Museum which will run at loss after loss for ever.
REFERENDUM on where the money should go please.
Mayor's & Councillors will come and go, but rate payers are here to stay !


Hmmm

Posted on 10-12-2024 17:12 | By Let's get real

I find it disgraceful to see for the very first time the predicted cost for the operational budget of the new empire building.
THIRTY MILLION DOLLARS...
How many additional "council" employees are we going to be paying six figures to..? Directors, managers and exhibition and creative directors...?

IT'S A CITY, NOT A THEME PARK.


I'm with you Rick,

Posted on 10-12-2024 17:13 | By nerak

and truly sorry you appear to a voice in the wilderness. You are quite right, the focus should be on affordability, and we cannot afford, at least any time in the near future, such fripperies as a museum and as above a library, both touted to cost $30m/year!!! Jen Scoular, I warmly invite you to pay my rates over the next 30 years. No, thought not. Get you head out of the clouds Jen, and move amongst the people you represent. Where is the hope to start saving money. There is none.


30 MILLION DOLLARS

Posted on 10-12-2024 17:15 | By Let's get real

That's THIRTY MILLION DOLLARS every year that is not being spent on the health, safety and wellbeing of the people paying the bills.


Sack all the council

Posted on 10-12-2024 21:01 | By Saul

No one wants a museum!!!

Absolutely fuming!!!!

I want a revolution


WHAT?

Posted on 10-12-2024 22:07 | By Yadick

You have got be to be drunk. Projected at more than $30m per year, it would be one of the most expensive library and museums in the country . . .
Museums are struggling and running at a loss all around the world. I would say 30 mil is very conservative just to make it sound better. We're a bankrupt city going daily, deeper into debt because of grandeur bad decisions.
It's time to pull your head out of the sand (I could certainly add to that) and start paying down debt and paying for must haves instead of nice to haves. We have enough museums already and they're hardly used. A museum, library and meeting rooms are NOT going to create a thriving metropolis. They will create thriving debt. Time to get real Mahé.


What an enormous waste of money

Posted on 11-12-2024 05:31 | By earlybird

$128M is way too much. We cannot afford it.


Whar

Posted on 11-12-2024 07:16 | By Angels

We had a referendum to stop this.
Is there no democracy .
This is crazy
Time for those who voted against to refuse to pay rates.


More wastage

Posted on 11-12-2024 08:30 | By The Sage

Just what percentage of the rate payers are going to use this facility? 10%, 20%? Seems the majority are paying for a small percentage. Glen Crowther and Rick Curach are the only ones talking sense. So they would lose money from unrecoverable payments already made. This is a drop in the bucket compared to the total cost and ongoing expenses. What about the $180,000.00 paid by the Council for a documentary which appears to be self promotional. No mention of that. We need to tell our stories according to Jen Schoular. I am sure there are less expensive ways of telling them. This reeks of a small group of entitled and out of touch bureaucrats making expensive decisions for the rest of us. Shame on you.


The Master

Posted on 11-12-2024 18:30 | By Ian Stevenson

The operating costs of $30m are based on a raft of fatal errors and assumptions... here are a couple of them...
1 The assumption that the total cost will be $303m or less, and
2 That TCC can raise 50% of that $151.5m from other than yet more debt...
3 The sale of assets is not going so well... The Marine Precinct (if it ever happens) is magically negotiated to be sold at $13.98m (market value >$34m...). Only the net after debt related is then available, as the debt is more then that means "Zero" left... I am sure TCC wonder-nuts will scheme up something to get around that?
4 No TCC budget is ever on target... the real game is to guess the magic number that it will actually be, I guess starting at >$450m would be logical.


The Master

Posted on 11-12-2024 18:35 | By Ian Stevenson

The annual costs to ratepayers will be around $40-50m/pa

With debt @ $250+m (as no way can $151.5m be raised externally) and adding the very likely cost blowouts, say $303m + 30-40% so another $90-130m more. then allow whatever more as TCC budgets are always BS anyway.

Debt dumped on TCC ratepayers will then be >$300-350m, interest @5+% = $15-20m easily.... Depreciation will be at least that... then the daily costs of wages, and expenses, TCC say $9m or so for that, so lets be realistic and say $15+m

We are at an annual costs of say $50-55m/pa or around $800-900/household in higher rates/pa


Unbelievable

Posted on 11-12-2024 21:15 | By Astradaz

I thought that this elected council would focus on the necessities of running a city. The people of the city rejected a museum in 2016 through the democratic process of a referendum. But that was quickly forgotten and continues to be. I am against this decision.


slow clap

Posted on 12-12-2024 08:27 | By Howbradseesit

for Mahe and Council.
So much for representing the people. At a time when everyone is tightening their belts you are throwing eye watering amounts of rate payer money at extravagant ego projects. And with that comes the message of "too bad" when our rates increase.
As someone who didn't even live in the Bay when you were elected I knew you would be a flop, Mahe.


Progress

Posted on 12-12-2024 16:53 | By Cliff B

The referendum is now over 6 years ago and 60% voted against, from a voter turnout of only 30% so 18% of eligible voters had their say against a museum. No point at looking backwards to that!
Again and again, we have been told we are paying the price for years and years of poor investment in the city. I am happy to see progress - next an upgraded stadium to be proud of.
Art and sport contribute to a happy and cohesive community.


I'm with narek and Yadick on this

Posted on 12-12-2024 17:23 | By morepork

These are "nice to haves" which we cannot currently afford and we SHOULD be attending to essentials and paying down some of the debt before embarking on stuff like this. I take Cliff 8s point on the referendum being out-of-date, but then maybe it's time we had another one, and include the whole CBD $300 million project in it. Our new council had an option to NOT proceed with it. Maybe a referendum and THEN a decision as to how the limited resources could best be utilized might have been a better way to go.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.