Tauranga City Council will ask residents which services they would be willing to sacrifice after the Government proposed capping rates.
Local Government Minister Simon Watts announced on December 1 the Government would to progress a rates cap to help councils keep rates increases under control and reduce pressure on household budgets.
Watts said analysis suggested a target range of 2-4% per capita, per year.
“This means rates increases would be limited to a maximum of 4%.”
Tauranga’s council has estimated a 13% average rates rise for 2027 – higher than the 10.4% increase it forecast in the 2024-34 Long-Term Plan.
If implemented, the rates cap would not come into force until in 2028.
With annual rates increases of between 5% and 11% forecast between 2028 and 2034, a cap could have a big impact on Tauranga ratepayers’ bills.
Public consultation
The council has agreed to plan public consultation to help the community understand the ramifications of paying lower rates.
Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the council could work towards lower rates; however, there would be consequences to cutting costs in terms of the level of services available.

Tauranga Mayor Mahé Drysdale. Photo / Alex Cairns
Drysdale said the consultation would bring light to what the community would be open to living without and the compromises they would be willing to make to achieve the rates cap.
The council’s preliminary draft budget for the next year outlines four key cost drivers: rising depreciation due to significant asset growth; finance costs associated with about $112m in additional debt; operating costs for new assets; and water activity surpluses to meet Local Water Done Well legislative requirements.
Drysdale said options for reducing rates included cutting planned capital expenditure; adjusting the council’s water service revenue expectations; selling some council assets; and increasing the charges for using some public services and facilities.
A S&P Global Ratings report noted the proposed national rates cap could tighten councils’ financial flexibility, create underinvestment risks, increase reliance on debt, potentially trigger credit downgrades and leave little room to restore service cuts later.
A Tauranga City Council staff report to Tuesday’s meeting said the impact of low rates on council services would be ongoing as the cap would not readily enable higher spending at a later date.
At the meeting, the council discussed ways to reduce the rates requirement for the $306 million civic precinct project Te Manawataki o Te Papa – a collection of new and redeveloped buildings in the CBD.
The options included using surplus parking income, asset sales, and airport revenue.

Tauranga City Council rates reduction options graphic.
RNZ reported the council decided to prioritise use of any profit from potential asset sales to offset new debt and rates-funded interest associated with Te Manawataki o Te Papa, and to seek more philanthropic support for the project.
Value for money
Pāpāmoa councillor Steve Morris told SunLive he supported the rates cap as it limited the amount of new debt the council could take on for non-core infrastructure.
“I don’t think people believe they have got value for money in the past,” he said.
Morris said the commission increased rates by 43% during its tenure.
Pāpāmoa Councillor Steve Morris. Photo / George Novak
“They addressed amenity, but it’s debatable whether they meaningfully addressed the infrastructure deficit.
“Council will need to look inward at operational expenditure and outward in terms of services.
“Some cuts and increases to user-pays may not be palatable, that’s why it’s vital we hear from people during consultation.”
Legislation
Watts said the rates cap would be based on a model with a target range for annual rates increases using long-term economic indicators such as inflation at the lower end, and GDP growth at the higher end.
Councils would not be able to increase rates beyond the upper end of the range, unless they had permission from a regulator appointed by central government.

Local Government Minister Simon Watts. Photo / Mark Mitchell
Permission would only be granted in extreme circumstances, such as a natural disaster, and councils would need to show how they would return to the target range.
The cap would apply to all sources of rates – general rates, targeted rates and uniform annual charges – but would exclude water charges and other non-rates revenue such as fees and charges.
Legislation would be enacted during 2026 and would take effect on January 1, 2027.
This would mark the beginning of a transitional period, enabling councils to incorporate the cap into their long-term planning.
Tauranga average rates increases
The gross average, net of growth and including volumetric water. As the council will begin separating volumetric water from the next Annual Plan, the average increase without water is
2026: 9.9% (minus water: 10.1%)
2025: 13.1% (minus water: 13.8%)
2024: 6.2% (minus water: 9.1%)
2023: 13.7% (minus water: 12.9%)
2022: 21.5% (minus water: 20%)
Ayla Yeoman is a journalist based in Tauranga. She holds a Bachelor of Arts degree majoring in Communications and Politics & International Relations from the University of Auckland, and has been a journalist since 2022.



20 comments
Tauranga seeks sacrifices to meet rates cap
Posted on 19-12-2025 10:26 | By Lisa-Marie
I nominate Cuts to Mayor and Council/Counsellor wages... Exorbitant salaries while rate payers and people of Tauranga suffer.
trying to deflect their waste
Posted on 19-12-2025 12:49 | By rotovend
goodness the rates rises are insanity maybe instead of trying to make it a government issue don't waste money of coffee and wage rises for councilor's and mayors etc. the councils have over-stepped their common-sense spending and become entitled bureaucrats its embarrassing what they waste and they should be held to account.
Over staffed
Posted on 19-12-2025 13:02 | By steve b
Look within your ranks to save, I believe you are severely over staffed, this little gem from a mouth within your business
The Master
Posted on 19-12-2025 14:20 | By Ian Stevenson
On of two
The issue is and has always been the rampant waste within TCC.
Of course, TCC Councilors are generally besotted by the desperate plight of TCC staff who wish to retain but preferably expand their own ranks 24/7 no matter the cost, use (often negative).
The answers are easy to find, see and remedy...
1 Focus only on essentials (20+ years to late to start that of course), that means three waters and roading. Nothing else is "essential"
2 Have a debt repayment plan as this is not one and never has been.
3 Look at what costs the most e.g. Museums revenue will not even be 10% of all the costs, Pools are the same, Libraries are @ 10% approx.
SELF SERVICE FIRST
Posted on 19-12-2025 14:23 | By glass1/2 full
Self service first for the council staff (from top to lower tiers). Could not agree more with Lisa-Marie's comment. When will they understand .... ratepayers DO NOT have a bottomless purse of money
The master
Posted on 19-12-2025 14:24 | By Ian Stevenson
Two of two
Of course TCC staff as usual as they do every year, highlight a minor and trivial things that they know there are a very small minority who to moan and squeal but never pay for what they demand everyone else pay for.
End result, Consent fees are ridiculously high, TCC costs are fabulously expensive, they have no idea how to be "Effective and efficient" except for one thing...
TCC are would famous for: - dreaming, creating, planning the most outrageous schemes and then self generating a facade, a story line (that is better than fiction story ever) to spin-doctor it to pretend that it is something else.
Seems like the council
Posted on 19-12-2025 14:31 | By earlybird
suggestions won't save much. Perhaps a major reduction in staffing levels should be considered.
Where to begin…
Posted on 19-12-2025 16:57 | By AuntyMinnie
we don’t need a museum, we really didn’t need the extravagant waterfront children’s playground, do we really need such a huge library, i could go on……
All the staff should be tested to see if their wages and positions could be downsized.
Ratepayers pay for all the mistakes made in the last few years and it needs to be stopped.
Just ask the ratepayers first !!!
Rates cap Not a Good Idea?
Posted on 19-12-2025 18:06 | By Watchdog
Now the Tauranga City Council is suggesting our services might suffer! This comes after it was revealed another 13.5% Rates Increase is planned for the coming year and even more the following year. No way!!! Cut your cloth TCC and maybe also cut down on staff. reduce all the nice to haves like one way streets in the CBD (what a shambles that area can be at times). Focus on Water, Sewerage, Stormwater, and roads. No fancy children's playgrounds costs millions of dollars. We are not a bottomless pit for your frivolities. And hopefully the Regional Council demise will save us some money as well. Like $400 per annum a year for buses I do not use. Go and look up and learn what Zero Base Budgetting means!!!!
Overlooked?
Posted on 19-12-2025 18:56 | By morepork
AuntieMinnie had a single throwaway line :
"Just ask the ratepayers first !!!" Amen!, Hear!, Hear!. The general public non-ratepayers couldn't care less about rate capping, and you can't blame them.
Ratepayers in Tauranga are treated with disdain and not listened to. It is time that changed.There should be public and ratepayer based referenda on controversial matters. The TCC Web site could support this; not social media.
They are going to obviously increase the charges for water, to help make up the non-expanded revenue. Ironically, this makes the business case for desalination even more attractive, because the product is worth more...
Lisa-Marie stated what most of us feel.
Why are they looking to cut services, when they just wasted hundreds of millions on indulging themselves with an unnecessarily large/flash building and shamefully exorbitant pay rises?
Proper management, and engagement with the community could easily prevent service cuts.
I haven’t noticed….
Posted on 19-12-2025 19:24 | By Shadow1
….anyone telling us how much we need to run the council if no extra work was carried out. Surely this is the basis of the level of rates we need to pay.
Only then can we know if we can afford to do other work. It’s not rocket science.
This must be followed by repaying debt. Only then should council consider “nice to haves”.
Shadow1.
Save money
Posted on 19-12-2025 20:33 | By Janey76
Why is a museum being built when a large majority of ratepayers said no to it in the referendum that was held, that was a waste of money and council have ignored what ratepayers want. Fix the streets and roads rather than appease the minority
Rates Ripoff
Posted on 19-12-2025 21:09 | By John Ref
The ratepayers do not need many of the overpaid employees of Tauranga City Council - Central Government had a big cull of roles not required...
Many dumb decisions are made by current employees who sit in their offices and don't understand the everyday challenges of local residents
I'm glad the rates rises are being capped and council amenities are "User Pays"
SIMPLE REALLY
Posted on 19-12-2025 21:48 | By The Caveman
Cut the staff by 20% !!! And stop the remaining staff hiding behind the "call centre" who will NEVER connect you to the person that you need to talk too, and who NEVER call you back despite repeated phone calls!
Chris 77
Posted on 19-12-2025 22:15 | By Chris 48
Keep in the means. The city ls in big debt. No money for new projects. Not a 300 million white elephant.
Staff trimming
Posted on 20-12-2025 08:02 | By roblee
Start trimming from the top down you have all just given yourselves another pay rise, courtesy of your employers us…. Love to come in for a coffee, and see what I paid for.
The list goes on…
Those that have Failed are telling us the best way Forward?
Posted on 20-12-2025 11:32 | By Avman
Is this some kind of joke? Council, which has consistently failed to balance the books and has put the city in ever more debt, is now going to tell us how they will fix it? Is this really what they call "consultation", giving us a short-list of 3 things to choose from (out of a possible list of thousands of ideas), and then telling us that it was our choice? How about Council opening the books and showing us the full and complete expenditure of council, without anything being hidden, by means of dodgy items being amalgamated into larger slush funds. There are a great many items that we are forced to unknowingly pay for, including gifts and grants to all and sundry. Hand-outs to chosen groups should be the first items to be chopped. Open the books properly and let the people choose.
@ AuntyMinnie
Posted on 20-12-2025 14:03 | By Yadick
Well said AuntyMinnie, well said. I do wonder what is wrong with the library we already have . . .
As for the museum, the meeting rooms for an elite few, the article gallery.
More should be done to get everyday, usable shops back. Offices, travel agents, adult shops etc are not going to make for a thriving metropolis.
Close Devonport Road from Farmers to the Strand. Put a big arched cover over it to weather proof it and have street markets, AnP Days, Christmas themed week, cultural weeks, market days, buskers week, . . . endless ideas.
Spending other peoples money
Posted on 21-12-2025 07:54 | By Moneywise
Central and local govt. Love spending money not thiers. We had i think a 85% referendum NOT to spend 150m on the museum..but the bew mayor said' we have spent $20m on the hole...its in the budget..lers do it'.AND HE IS INCHARGE OF TAURANGA....how can we save money with him driving the city. And all the deputy wants to do is spend $1.5m fixing playgrounds that dont need fixing. Maybe if they had stopped the marine precinct sale we could have saved that $49m loss...but no.....not thier money..too hard a fight🤔. The answer is STOP SPENDING on nice stuff..sack staff earning more than $200k...remove most councilors who sit round the table and dont ask questions and dont stop Mahe.
Selling assets
Posted on 21-12-2025 08:46 | By Moneywise
Whoops I forgot..
If council does consider selling assets, MAYBE THIS TIME...they get 3 market valuations from experts...i would suggest out of town valuers ,not mates..list the assets on the open market..and keep council staff away from any sale negotiations.. We dont want and Christchurch buyer 'stumbling' on another give away. bargin.🤫🤫🤔🤔
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.