Council backs down on “cash grab” sports fees

Sports clubs will pay a fee for senior teams to train on fields from 2025. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Fees for using Tauranga sports fields have been scaled back because clubs feared it would prevent people playing.

Tauranga City Council was proposing to charge adult teams fees for matches and training as part of the draft 2024-34 long-term plan (LTP).

At LTP deliberations on Monday the council removed the match fees and pushed back the date training fees would be paid until the 2025 winter sports season.

The fee structure is based on a single week of training time. Council would charge $258 per hour, per field/wicket, per week for adult teams. This would form the total fee for the season, rather than being charged every week.

From July 2025, the proposed fee would have increased to also charge $258 for each game or match, but this has been ditched.

Dozens of sports clubs spoke at the LTP hearings in February, all of them were concerned high fees would stop people playing. 

Todd Morris, of the Ōtūmoetai Cadets Cricket Club, said during the hearing the new fee was a “cash grab of low hanging fruit".

Charging senior teams would still impact the juniors, he said. “If you kill the senior clubs, the junior clubs will soon follow.”

Tauranga City AFC chairperson Brendon McHugh at the long-term plan hearings in February. Photo: Alisha Evans/SunLive.

Tauranga City AFC chairperson Brendon McHugh said football was a grassroots sport and needed to be affordable.

Higher council fees would need to be offset by increasing the costs for members.

“This will ultimately cause those who can pay to play.”

At Monday’s meeting, council community services general manager Barbara Dempsey said the fees “didn’t hit the mark” with the community.

 Council staff had worked with sports clubs and Dempsey said they acknowledged they needed to pay something towards maintaining fields.

“Where we’ve landed is probably reasonably fair.”

The council spends $2.5 million on maintaining sports fields and would get around $115,000 in annual revenue from the training fees by 2027. With the match fees it would have been $230,000.

The new fee structure would also provide a 50 per cent discount for “emerging sports” that has fewer than 100 participants, were established for less than five years and where over 10 per cent of participants were from low socio-economic backgrounds.

A season is based on being three months or longer with fees for half a field or a smaller season worked out proportionally.

Council strategic planning and partnerships, spaces and places manager Ross Hudson said the match fees would have had the largest impact on sports clubs.

“That really tipped the balance around affordability.

“Where we've landed represents a balance between affordability and therefore participation.”

Hudson said staff would continue to work with sports clubs to look at the effects of the fees and make changes if needed.

Commission chair Anne Tolley said the reduced fees recognised the public good that sports clubs do. Photo: John Borren/SunLive.

Commission chair Anne Tolley said they had to be fair to all sports users and the field fees were recognition that indoor sports paid “a fair whack” in indoor court fees.

“It isn't really about the revenue because as we've seen it doesn't actually make a dent in the costs. But it's about accepting that everyone has to pay a bit towards it, and every little bit helps.”

Ratepayers picked up the rest of the costs for maintaining the fields, but this was recognition of the “public good” that sports did, said Tolley.

Commissioner Bill Wasley said the fields were also green spaces that contributed to the amenity of the city which you couldn’t always put a dollar value on.

The 2024-34 long term plan will be adopted at a meeting on April 22.

LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.

4 comments

Hmmm

Posted on 07-03-2024 19:06 | By Let's get real

I have to be consistent with my opinion and submit that we must have user pays. I recall from the days that we were involved in sport, that our donations to the club were to a large extent being siphoned off to support the purchase of equipment and funds for the more elite teams, players and paid employees in the sport. If our very young players weren't supporting the league and their paid employees, there would be more funds available to support their activities locally. The central bodies of these sports are parasitic on the youngsters that want to have fun and the goodwill of local councils.
I don't believe for a second that the full cost of providing grass in our reserves is only $2.5 million. That's probably just the cost to mow the grass. What's the cost of re-seeding, spraying, fertiliser, repairs and water.?


Epic backdown !

Posted on 08-03-2024 12:48 | By Jenny K

Wow, can't believe the backdown when Indoor sports fought just as hard to have our 50%-60% increases tailed back. Just how do we get our message across to the powers that be that the indoor costs per hour per court are causing huge stress in providing community sport.


We already have user pays?!!?

Posted on 08-03-2024 12:54 | By Kauritatahi

As ratepayers we already pay for the upkeep of these fields, so expecting alot of the same people to pay again is essentially double-dipping!
Let's also realise that the public already own this land, it's not 'council land' but 'public land' that is administered by the council. Attempting to charge non-profit sports clubs at corporate rates to use their own land, is absurd and obscene.
The issue here is that the council bureaucracy with too many staff and too many expenses due to their grandiose schemes and pet projects, is desperate for new money sources to make their own mis-management look better on paper. At the end of the day this is a council management failure, and amateur sports groups especially should not be screwed over in order to help fund the downtown Tauranga money-pit.


The Master

Posted on 08-03-2024 15:32 | By Ian Stevenson

I agree that sports is important and should be affordable.

But the real issue is that TCC is involved and so all then is at a huge cost for no meaningful reason/purpose. If TCC just went away and stayed away would massively benefit all sports clubs, however TCC staff see themselves as as the "knowing all" about everything, so want to control the entire planet 24/7, to be a self appointed dictator effectively.


Leave a Comment


You must be logged in to make a comment.