A ferry service for Tauranga has passed another hurdle, with the newly elected council agreeing to help subside the fares.
If it goes ahead, commuters would be able to catch a ferry between Salisbury Wharf in downtown Mount Maunganui and Tauranga city centre.
Auckland water taxi company Hauraki Express is prepared to build two ferries for the service if local councils subsidise the fares.
It would begin as a two-year trial, with the goal of becoming a permanent service that could expand to include new routes in time.
At a meeting on Monday, Tauranga City Council agreed to fund up to $1.4m for the two-year trial provided the Bay of Plenty Regional Council does the same.
It’s the second time Tauranga City Council has made a decision about the ferries. The commission agreed to fund the service back in May.
The regional council deferred its decision earlier this month because it wanted to ensure the service would have support from the elected council.
Amy and Peter Bourke, of Hauraki Express, hope to run a ferry service in Tauranga. Photo: Alisha Evans.
Hauraki Express special projects manager Amy Bourke said their proposal was different to previous studies into ferries in Tauranga.
“It uses a fleet of small fast and nimble ferries that can get into shallow places,” she said in the meeting’s public forum.
It also didn’t require any new onshore infrastructure, Bourke said.
The fully-enclosed ferries would have seating for 30 people and space for 15 bikes. A ferry trip would cost $6 each way and take about 17 minutes.
“Tauranga has many transport challenges brought about by rapid growth, having the largest port and local geography,” Bourke said.
The harbour wasn’t conducive to efficient roading layouts and Tauranga was reliant on roads for private and public transport, she said.
An artist's concept of the interior of the proposed Tauranga ferry. Image: Supplied.
“The harbour should be looked at as an opportunity, not an obstacle,” Bourke said.
“It is very unusual that Tauranga does not use the harbour for transport purposes.
“Tauranga should take advantage of our blue highway.”
Hauraki Express director Peter Bourke said 1.8 per cent of Tauranga commuters used public transport compared to the national average of 4.2 per cent.
More than 90 per cent of trips around Tauranga were done by single-occupant vehicles compared to 67 per cent nationally, he said.
“Tauranga must give travellers a reason to not just jump in the car.”
The ferry service offered a safe and enjoyable connection between the urban centres, Peter Bourke said.
Deputy mayor Jen Scoular says the ferry service is a fantastic new offering. Photo: Alisha Evans.
Deputy mayor Jen Scoular said solutions needed to be found for the congestion people were facing every day.
“We do know we have to change the mode of transport.
“From a public transport perspective, it’s a fantastic new offering.”
Councillor Glen Crowther said he struggled to bet on the service until he could get assurance the council would prioritise core infrastructure for public transport, like a bus interchange in the CBD.
“There’s potentially a great time in the future when this [ferry service] will be invaluable.”
Tauranga mayor Mahé Drysdale said it was worth giving the ferry service a try. Photo: Alisha Evans.
Mayor Mahé Drysdale said the proposal took a lot of the risk and the cost of a ferry trial out of the council’s hands.
“It’s worth giving it a try.”
If the council were to run a ferry trial it would cost a minimum of $4 million, he said.
A November 2023 feasibility report by the regional council said there would be significant cost barriers with ferry operations.
The cost to the regional council if it were to buy and refit three vessels would have been $4.5m, with an annual running cost of $700,000.
The regional council will consider the proposal again in September.
The Bourkes were hoping to have the service running by Easter 2025 but were now looking at October 2025 if both councils agreed to the funding.
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
12 comments
Hmmm
Posted on 28-08-2024 18:55 | By Let's get real
I'm certainly not against having a ferry, I'm against any council investment.
We had another tourism venture, for that's what this is, that was forced out of business having been told to build their own (just one) dock at a cost of around $400,000 and gift it to other interested parties.
Our council should see this venture for what it is.... NOT council business
Are you listening Mahe!
Posted on 28-08-2024 18:59 | By Equality
You promised to listen to the people. As have all the mayors before you!
We assumed you had a modicum of common sense. Seems the ratepayers were wrong - again! A recent Sunlive poll showed that 88% of us use our CARS! Nothing will get us out of our cars! Ferries could be construed as a 'nice to have' but it is NOT a 'nice to have' - it will be another chain around the taxpayers necks.
Are the councilors prepared to fund the deficit themselves? If NOT - then there is your answer. Say NO to this ridiculous venture!
Remember the crumbling infrastructure and the much needed roads! These are your priority!
NO, REPEAT NO NO NO
Posted on 28-08-2024 21:08 | By The Caveman
Ratepayer money !!!!
If it's a "good" business proposition then let the proposer fund it !!!!
Here goes more of our money
Posted on 28-08-2024 21:48 | By nerak
It is simply reckless for council to be throwing OUR money at this latest fancy. It is also ridiculous for Jen Scoular to call it a 'fantastic new offering'. 'public transport', nonsense! Bitterly disappointed the mayor says “It’s worth giving it a try.” Really, Mahe! Your pockets must be much deeper than many ratepayers'. I just cannot see that anyone thinks a few ferry trips are going to make a huge difference to road congestion. Hardly likely any income this couple make will go anywhere but their own pockets.
First 3
Posted on 28-08-2024 22:38 | By Yadick
First 3 comments are very good comments and the last sentence in the comment from 'The Caveman' sums it all up absolutely perfectly.
Take heed and listen to the people Mahé.
Senseless
Posted on 28-08-2024 23:59 | By The Truth Is Out There
$6 one way, and 17 mins.
By ferry...
If you are a gold card holder. You can get bus for free, and if not the couple of hrs, log jam,(literally and figuratively), in Torata St. Peak hr am/pm
There in less then 15 mins.
Waste of a million?
But, then USA, in debt too tune of 53 trillion.
So guess Tga council/WBOPC, got a few more dollars to ring up yet.
But, no doubt they will...
Really ? Have you been listening
Posted on 29-08-2024 06:22 | By Naysay
We have tried this not once but twice already. Ratepayers have a right to say no . In these Economic times your minister says to tighten the belt . The issue with transport in Tauranga isn't just unprecedented growth its poor design compounded by Port and industrial traffic on the road . The same time as regular traffic . How about restrictions the trucks like they do in developed countries to free up the roads. That would be a start.
Crazy
Posted on 29-08-2024 09:33 | By an_alias
What a waste of more money, endless it seems.
90% single use cars, what a joke, have you seen the huge buses 99% running with ZERO people.
The icing is to see a bus driver with face mask and empty bus, just wow.
Council
Posted on 29-08-2024 10:11 | By peanuts9
They've been there a month & already they are spending ratepayers money subsidising a business. Where is the benefit for the residents of the city?
Truck restrictions
Posted on 29-08-2024 18:36 | By 3118
Rather than a ferry how about putting a heavy vehicle restriction from SH27A at Baypark through Hewlett's from 7am-9am. The Port and trucks can alter their scheduling to accommodate this. That is the window that causes the ridiculous holdups
Disconcerting action !
Posted on 29-08-2024 19:31 | By You Must be Joking !
It is disappointingly evident that the new Mayor and his Deputy are as far out of touch with reality as the previous bunch of appointed Administrators. Their reported decision to subsidise a Ferry Service, demonstrates that neither has any Business Acumen, nor any degree of Common Sense. Should the pair wish to invest their own money in such a venture then please go ahead, otherwise leave well alone. A fool and his money are soon parted.
The Mayor...
Posted on 31-08-2024 14:16 | By morepork
... is trying to be reasonable.
The trouble is that we have had TWO previous attempts at a ferry service and they both failed.
That means that a new attempt has to meet more rigid requirements than the previous ones:
1. If it can't be done WITHOUT spending Other People's Money (OPM). then it should be considered "non-viable".
2. To try and justify it because it will ameliorate the current problems with road traffic flow, is simply nonsense. It will have little to no effect in the broad scheme of things; those problems will need much deeper and more complex solutions.
CONCLUSION:
It would be "nice to have" a ferry service across the harbour, particularly in the Tourist season, but, if it can't be done without cost to Ratepayers, then we shouldn't do it. If it truly is financially viable, then privately fund it.
Leave a Comment
You must be logged in to make a comment.